|
Bush Executive Order on Airline Security Now Imperative
Federation of States, November 4, 2001 -
We reported in an article entitled “Presidential Executive Orders Now
Required” on October 10, 2001 that:
|
“our airlines are at greater risk now than
before the September 11th attack and both Congress
and the Executive Branch are at fault.”
|
We further stated:
|
“Hear us Washington! We are mad and not fooled.
We have no choice but to take matters into our own personal hands
aboard flights. If someone or group attempts to take over the
aircraft and or gain access to the cockpit, we, the individual
passengers, must act to save our own lives in self defense and
no Federal edict against this can prevent our action. Either you,
in Washington act quickly, or anarchy will be the rule of the
skies in our flights.”
|
And finally we stated:
|
“History has shown that Congress is not normally
able to respond to such domestic civil defense measures with
sufficient unity to speedily pass effective legislation to provide
for this defense of the lives of the American public. Indeed, now
for several weeks Congress has not passed effective legislation to
provide real security for passengers of the commercial airline
industry.”
Therefore, the Federation of States and its associated state Southern
Independence Party organizations now calls upon President Bush
to expeditiously issue the required Executive Orders to insure real
airline security."
|
It has now been nearly four weeks more since we wrote that article and it is
true that now some airlines have beefed up their cockpit doors and there may
be an occasional undercover Air Marshall aboard. Yet we continue to hear
reports of people getting past the electronic pat down area with pistols and
knives while we dutifully stop 75 year old grandmothers from boarding with
her knitting needles.
In the movie The Ten Commandments, after his failure to stop Moses Caesar’s
wife dug at him and asked bitterly “Do you hear laughter Caesar?” But it was
not a laughing matter to Caesar and this deplorable security breech is not a
laughing matter to the American passenger public. And if the electronic carry
on screening is not bad enough, less than 10% of the checked baggage is being
X-rayed or physically examined. Many bombs could be packed in that baggage by
terrorists quite willing to die just to bring the aircraft down and create a
“big event."
Meanwhile, our national guard bravely and nearly meaninglessly stands guard
at our airports, essentially doing nothing but enhancing the appearance to
security. It would not be difficult to train them to examine baggage, vastly
increasing the percentage of checked baggage that would be safe, at least
until permanent personnel could be hired and trained.
Admirably, President Bush has tried to wait it out until Congress could pass
a viable airline safety bill. That, however, has failed and is very unlikely
to occur due to partisan political views for and against federalism. (The
hiring of 30,000 federal employees to check the baggage). We cannot afford to
wait longer. The political downside for President Bush will be enormous if
another passenger plane is hijacked and crashed into some target. The
President can ill afford to wait longer on Congress, nor does he have a
Constitutional requirement to wait for Congress during time of war once
Congress has effectively passed a declaration of war.
Still, if President Bush wants to chance waiting it out for Congress to pass
a bill he can sign some compromise will be needed apparently. We recognize
the political dilemma in Congress and offer a possible solution other than
those being offered on Capital Hill. President Bush could maintain his
objection to hiring some 30,000 federal employees to do the job of security
needed and yet give the option to the various States to either hire private
security firms or to provide State employees to perform the necessary security
under federal guidelines and direct federal supervision. This might persuade
enough Democrats to pass a bill acceptable to the President. Many of the
States, for example, have a State Guard in addition to their State National
Guard. The State Guard in some States has the mission of military police,
thus they could be an immediate resource to the States for airport security.
Even if Congress did not show interest in this idea of using the States for
security of airports within their boundaries, this could be incorporated in
the needed Executive Order solving our dilemma. In our article on
Presidential Executive Orders published October 10, 2001 we outlined a
rather complete proposed Executive Order. We will not repeat that here
although most of the measures outlined are still applicable. However, by
utilizing the State machinery under federal guidelines and supervision, the
public would feel secure and the federalists would be partially assuaged
since State employees could be used and the decision would be up to the
States. That would be a State’s rights thing to do and the football would
be effectively passed.
Please, Mr. President, issue an EXECUTIVE ORDER this week for airline security.
Federation of States Staff
|